NL-R-007

fatalPeppol BIS Billing 3.0profileCIIUBL

For suppliers in the Netherlands, the supplier MUST provide a means of payment (cac:PaymentMeans) if the payment is from customer to supplier

Why it fails

The invoice expects payment from the customer but states no means of payment.

How to fix it

Add cac:PaymentMeans with a payment means code and, for a transfer, the IBAN.

What the validator checks

CII — context /rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementHeaderMonetarySummation[$supplierCountryIsNL]

(normalize-space(/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:ExchangedDocument/ram:TypeCode/text()) != '381' and xs:decimal(ram:DuePayableAmount) <= 0.0) or (normalize-space(/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:ExchangedDocument/ram:TypeCode/text()) = '381' and xs:decimal(ram:DuePayableAmount) >= 0.0) or (/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans)

UBL — context cac:LegalMonetaryTotal[$supplierCountryIsNL]

(/ubl-invoice:Invoice and xs:decimal(cbc:PayableAmount) <= 0.0) or (/ubl-creditnote:CreditNote and xs:decimal(cbc:PayableAmount) >= 0.0) or (//cac:PaymentMeans)

Related rules

Part of NL-R — Netherlands.

• NL-R-001
• NL-R-002
• NL-R-003
• NL-R-004
• NL-R-005
• NL-R-006
• NL-R-008
• NL-R-009

Validate an invoice against this rule →

This is a Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 rule: an invoice can be perfectly valid EN 16931 and still be rejected by it.