DK-R-005

fatalPeppol BIS Billing 3.0profileCIIUBL

For Danish suppliers the following Payment means codes are allowed: 1, 10, 31, 42, 48, 49, 50, 58, 59, 93 and 97

Why it fails

The payment means code is not one Denmark accepts.

How to fix it

Danish suppliers may use 1, 10, 31, 42, 48, 49, 50, 58, 59, 93 or 97. The two Danish-specific ones are 50 (Giro) and 93 (FIK); 58 is SEPA credit transfer.

What the validator checks

CII — context rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans

(contains(' 1 10 31 42 48 49 50 58 59 93 97 ', concat(' ', ram:TypeCode, ' ')))

UBL — context ubl-invoice:Invoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/cac:PaymentMeans

contains(' 1 10 31 42 48 49 50 58 59 93 97 ', concat(' ', cbc:PaymentMeansCode, ' '))

Related rules

Part of DK-R — Denmark.

• DK-R-002
• DK-R-003
• DK-R-004
• DK-R-006
• DK-R-007
• DK-R-008
• DK-R-009
• DK-R-010
• DK-R-011
• DK-R-013
• DK-R-014
• DK-R-016
• DK-R-017

Validate an invoice against this rule →

This is a Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 rule: an invoice can be perfectly valid EN 16931 and still be rejected by it.