DK-R-003

warningPeppol BIS Billing 3.0profileCIIUBL

If ItemClassification is provided from Danish suppliers, UNSPSC version 19.05.01 or 26.08.01 should be used.

Why it fails

A Danish supplier gave an item classification from an unexpected UNSPSC version.

How to fix it

Use UNSPSC version 19.05.01 or 26.08.01, or drop the classification. Warning only.

What the validator checks

CII — context rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:IncludedSupplyChainTradeLineItem

not((ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct/ram:DesignatedProductClassification/ram:ClassCode/@listID = 'TST') and not((ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct/ram:DesignatedProductClassification/ram:ClassCode/@listVersionID = '19.05.01') or (ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct/ram:DesignatedProductClassification/ram:ClassCode/@listVersionID = '19.0501') or (ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct/ram:DesignatedProductClassification/ram:ClassCode/@listVersionID = '26.08.01') or (ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct/ram:DesignatedProductClassification/ram:ClassCode/@listVersionID = '26.0801') ) )

UBL — context ubl-creditnote:CreditNote[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/cac:CreditNoteLine | ubl-invoice:Invoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/cac:InvoiceLine

not((cac:Item/cac:CommodityClassification/cbc:ItemClassificationCode/@listID = 'TST') and not((cac:Item/cac:CommodityClassification/cbc:ItemClassificationCode/@listVersionID = '19.05.01') or (cac:Item/cac:CommodityClassification/cbc:ItemClassificationCode/@listVersionID = '19.0501') or (cac:Item/cac:CommodityClassification/cbc:ItemClassificationCode/@listVersionID = '26.08.01') or (cac:Item/cac:CommodityClassification/cbc:ItemClassificationCode/@listVersionID = '26.0801') ) )

Related rules

Part of DK-R — Denmark.

• DK-R-002
• DK-R-004
• DK-R-005
• DK-R-006
• DK-R-007
• DK-R-008
• DK-R-009
• DK-R-010
• DK-R-011
• DK-R-013
• DK-R-014
• DK-R-016
• DK-R-017

Validate an invoice against this rule →

This is a Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 rule: an invoice can be perfectly valid EN 16931 and still be rejected by it.