CII-SR-399

warningEN 16931syntax binding ruleCII

SettlementPeriodMeasure should not be present

Why it fails

'SettlementPeriodMeasure' is present, but this profile does not allow it — nothing in the EN 16931 semantic model maps to it.

How to fix it

Remove 'SettlementPeriodMeasure'. It is almost always left over from a generic template or a library that emits every field of the underlying schema. Reported as a warning.

What the validator checks

CII — context /rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement

not(ram:SpecifiedTradePaymentTerms/ram:SettlementPeriodMeasure)

Related rules

Part of CII-SR — CII restrictions.

• CII-SR-001
• CII-SR-002
• CII-SR-003
• CII-SR-006
• CII-SR-007
• CII-SR-008
• CII-SR-009
• CII-SR-010
• CII-SR-011
• CII-SR-012
• CII-SR-013
• CII-SR-014
• CII-SR-015
• CII-SR-016
• CII-SR-017
• CII-SR-018
• CII-SR-019
• CII-SR-020
• CII-SR-021
• CII-SR-022
• CII-SR-023
• CII-SR-024
• CII-SR-025
• CII-SR-026

Validate an invoice against this rule →